TriLinc Global is proud to be featured as an industry leader at the annual Big Path Capital Impact Capitalism Summit

On April 26th & 27th at the Union League Club of Chicago, Big Path Capital will host over 300 family offices, asset managers, and fund managers representing over $150 Bn in investable assets. The Impact Capitalism Summit aims to help institutional investors explore the links between social, environmental and financial capital. Click here for more information on the Big Path Capital Impact Capitalism Conference!

Morgan Stanley Sustainable Investing Challenge Finals Begin Today!

The 2016 Morgan Stanley Sustainable Investing Challenge Finals begin today! Tune in as ten graduate, student-led teams from around the world compete in Hong Kong to pitch creative investment solutions that seek positive environmental or social impact alongside competitive financial returns to a panel of judges.

These past few years, TriLinc Global has been a proud mentor to students in the Sustainable Investing Challenge. This year, TriLinc Global Chairman and CEO, Gloria Nelund, has been selected as a Final Round Judge where she will lend her real world investment perspective on impact investing to evaluate the final round pitches.

The Sustainable Investing Challenge Finals will take place in Hong Kong on April 15, 2016. For the most up to date information on the Sustainable Investing Challenge follow @SI_Challenge on Twitter!

The Increasing Demand for ESG Scoring and the Benefits of Standardization

As we start off the New Year, TriLinc Global will be discussing notable trends from 2015 that we see as relevant to the development and growth of the impact investing sector in 2016 and beyond. This is the third post in a four-part series.


Coinciding with the rise of entrants in the impact investing space is a similarly mounting demand for increased rigor and standardization around ESG reporting. According to US SIF Foundation’s biennial survey, “Unlocking ESG Integration,” the inclusion of ESG factors into portfolio management grew at a rapid pace between 2012 and 2014, reaching almost $5 trillion in US-domiciled assets. However, a key challenge for asset owners and investment managers has been the lack of an effective, uniform and all-inclusive way to measure ESG factors and impact goals.

Ernst & Young’s 2015 global survey, “Tomorrow’s Investment Rules 2.0,” reported that although 71 percent of institutional investor respondents considered integrated reports – which include both financial and ESG information – essential to making investment decisions, over 25 percent said that nonfinancial information had not affected their investment decisions over the past year.  The reason for this was primarily due to the difficulty of verifying and comparing ESG and impact data across firms.

In response, industry players are making strides to develop ESG assessment tools and services, so that investors can use ESG data to more effectively drive investment decisions and portfolio monitoring practices. As of 2014, Bloomberg, one of the largest information gathering and dissemination models in the investment management industry, had gathered and reported ESG data to 17,000 ESG data service subscribers on over 11,000 companies spanning 65 countries.  By adding “non-financial” ESG data to its product offering, Bloomberg has been an active change agent in the sector.

Another new player in the field is Morningstar, which is partnering with Sustainalytics to bring ESG scoring into the mainstream by assigning ratings to global mutual and exchange-traded funds (ETFs).  Resulting from heightened investor demand for more transparent information about ESG practices, Morningstar will test how companies and investment managers effectively gather, report and incorporate ESG information into the analysis and risk profile of their investments.  The new Morningstar ESG ratings will guide institutional firms that create and manage mutual funds and ETFs for the retail market, and will empower “main street” investors to make investment decisions that are both value-based and values-based.

Another industry partnership seeks to offer institutional investors insights into ESG risks, including those not reported through public companies’ mandatory public disclosures. In September 2015, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), which provides corporate governance and proxy voting services, began offering its clients ESG screening, analysis and stewardship tools using analytics and metrics provided by RepRisk.  This partnership helps ISS clients – asset owners, investment managers, hedge funds, broker-dealers and custodian banks – manage compliance, reputational and investment risks related to their portfolio companies’ ESG activities.

The burgeoning development of analytical frameworks underscores the demand for the integration of ESG variables into investment management practices.  However, the industry has not yet established a universally accepted approach to ESG methodology, measurement, benchmarking and reporting, as it has for other investment performance metrics.  A growing but still nascent trend, ESG integration will achieve mainstream proportions as sector players assess the various options and coalesce around broadly accepted approaches. Such standardization is crucial to better investment decision-making practices, and will lead to improved risk management and an enhanced understanding of ESG across a portfolio’s performance.

– This post is the third in the four-part series, “Impact Investing: What’s to Come in 2016,” written by Melissa Tickle, TriLinc Global Impact & ESG Analyst.

Retail Investors: Rising Interest and Opportunity in Impact Investing

As we start off the New Year, TriLinc Global will be discussing notable trends from 2015 that we see as relevant to the development and growth of the impact investing sector in 2016 and beyond. This is the second post in a four-part series.


As TriLinc looks toward 2016, it is clear that the evolving regulatory landscape is creating a more enabling environment for a myriad of investors to align their capital with their values in pursuit of economic, environmental and social goals.

This environment has facilitated the expansion of impact products available in the market – from social impact bonds, to mutual funds and exchange-traded funds – and has transcended traditional product offerings to more closely meet investors’ specific ESG and impact interests. Until recently, however, few products were specially tailored to retail investors, compared to institutional and high net worth investors. With the arrival of retail, market-rate impact products in the past few years, retail investors at last are receiving due recognition as essential participants in the impact investment space.

Recent studies validate the retail channel’s importance to the sector. A report by the Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN) dated April 2015, “ImpactBase Snapshot: An Analysis of 300+ Impact Investing Funds,” found that 17 percent of market-rate impact funds targeted retail investors. Given the relative size of the retail investing market – roughly 91 million investors according to BNY Mellon – the retail channel represents a significant market opportunity for the impact investing community.

Financial advisors are in agreement. A recent survey by SRI examining financial professionals’ views on impact investing found that over half of surveyed financial advisors either currently offer, or have offered, SRI and/or ESG investment strategies to their retail clients. Perhaps even more revealing is that 73 percent said impact investing would become a “somewhat bigger” or “much bigger” part of their practice over the next five years.

This is in large part because retail investors are driving the demand for impact and ESG products across their portfolio allocations. A study conducted by Morgan Stanley showed that 71 percent of individual investors are interested in sustainable investing.  According to SRI, 58 percent of advisors claimed the foremost reason they offered impact investing to their clients was in response to demand. Millennials, women, and college-educated investors were among the top three investor profiles requesting impact strategies from their advisors, followed by high net worth individuals, baby boomers and senior investors.

With demand for impact investing in the retail space being driven from the bottom up, the development of tailored impact product offerings for retail investors will continue to be of vital importance. As retail investors continue to increase their knowledge and appetite for impact, and gain access to more market-based investment options, they will exponentially increase the flow of capital dedicated to solving challenges facing our society.

– This post is the second in the four-part series, “Impact Investing: What’s to Come in 2016,” written by Melissa Tickle, TriLinc Global Impact & ESG Analyst.

More Impact Investors Are Going "All In"

If you want to keep up with the latest buzzwords in impact investing, here’s an important one starting to hit its stride:  “all in.”  It means placing your whole portfolio into assets with a positive social and/or environmental impact. Putting your money–all of it–where your mouth is.

Recently technology executive, entrepreneur and investor Charly  Kleissner started a network of  super high net worth individuals  aiming to do just that, called the 100%IMPACT Network.

For Kleissner and his wife Lisa—she is president of the KL Felicitas Foundation, a 14-year-old family foundation based in San Francisco supporting social entrepreneurs the two formed—it started back around 2004 when they  began  to get serious about completely aligning all their investments with their values. It was easier said than done. “There weren’t that many products in different asset classes,” says Kleissner. That led to the founding of Toniic, a global group of impact investors  aggregating  their capital and investing in early stage social enterprises. Then more recently they got the idea to start a network for compatriots who were similarly interested in going all in.

They wouldn’t pool their investments, but they would compare investments, results, and, perhaps most important, impact measurements. Also they would serve as a model for other investors. According to Kleissner, there are now 35 participants with $3 million to $650 million in assets and a total of $3.5 billion in commitments.  That includes 25 family offices and about six foundations. Over the next three years, Kleissner says he’s hoping to prove that the bigger the portfolio, the better the return. So a triple digit portfolio could have triple digit profits, and so on. Further, Kleissner says that there are at least 10 million Americans with $1 million or more in investable assets–“if we show over the next couple of years you can build million dollar portfolios that are all in–it could release a movement.”

Click here to read more.

Majority of HNWIs Rate Social Impact Investing as ‘Extremely Important’

More than 60% of global high net worth individuals (HNWIs) see driving social impact with their investments as “extremely or very important”, with Asian HNWIs valuing it higher than any other region in the world. According to research by RBC Wealth Management, HNWIs in India put the highest emphasis on social impact in the Asia-Pacific region, with over 90% citing it as a key concern, followed closely by China and Indonesia at 89% and Hong Kong at 82%. RBC said its research also showed that HNWIs want more support from their wealth managers in achieving their social impact goals, suggesting socially responsible investing, impact investing and donations as potential solutions. In addition, wealth management firms that invest time in understanding the importance clients place on driving social impact, and work to identify “appropriate mechanisms” to fulfil these goals, have a better chance at creating “deeper” HNWI relationships over time. Age is also a huge factor in socially responsible investment, with three quarters of HNWIs aged under 40 citing it as an important factor compared with just 45% of those over 60, siting that the most popular way they invest in such global causes is by making investment choices with a “clearly defined objective to create positive social impact.”

Click here to read more.